Categories › Business & Finance › Legal & compliance documents
Decide whether AI may be used for a legal task, who drafts and who checks. Australian law.
Remote server: your requests and data go to ailawframework.com. Claude Code: claude mcp add --transport http ai-law-framework https://ailawframework.com/mcp · Claude app: Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector.
The tools this server listed when we connected to it, in its own words.
start_task — Opens a work record for one legal task and returns the clarifying questions the framework needs answered (step 1, define the task), less anyrecord_answers — Adds the user’s answers to the clarifying questions to the work record. Returns the questions still open, or, once all are answered, the resrecord_research — Adds research findings, each with its source, quote and confirmation status, to the work record. Returns the required research still missingassess_and_decide — Scores the AI option on adoption, efficiency and governance (step 2), caps governance by the recorded evidence, scores the manual route, andplan_human_work — Sets the level of each of the seven stages of the task (step 3) from the recorded answers, research and decision, and returns what the lawyework_record — Returns the work record as markdown (steps 4 and 5): the task, the evidence, the decision, the plan, what the AI did, and the checks, approvsearch_library — Searches the framework’s published practice areas, tasks, jurisdiction versions, jurisdictions, firm-wide obligations, software profiles, prget_task_guidance — Returns one task from the practice library: how AI may be used, its level, what the lawyer must review, its checkpoints, restrictions and soget_jurisdiction_guidance — Returns the framework’s notes for one jurisdiction, and which stored AI instruments apply to a task in a court or tribunal. Name the forum, get_software_profile — Returns the framework’s research on one AI product and plan: its facts, the governance considerations found, and the cited sources with theisearch_precedents — Searches the published precedent library (letters, agreements, clauses, checklists, forms, policies and more for every practice area) by titget_precedent — Returns one published precedent’s details: summary, when to use it, authorities, the AI-use guidance (level, what AI may and must not do, whget_started — For a new user, or when asked what this is: what the AI Law Framework decides, the first questions it asks (country, then state or territoryget_framework — Returns the AI Law Framework’s rules: the five steps, the three pillars and their anchors, the decision rule, the four levels, the seven starefine_legal_query — Restates one Australian legal question and lists the clarifying questions still open: state or territory, dates, parties, forum, output and get_practice_area_prompt — Returns the published practice-area prompt for one Australian area. Court AI rules are attached when a jurisdiction code is given.find_rules — Returns the stored court and tribunal AI instruments that match a task and a forum, using the catalogue rule matcher. With a forum named, guassess_tool_use — Returns the catalogue adoption, efficiency and governance for one tool on one task, plus the matching court AI rules. Unlisted tools stay nodisclosure_duties — Returns the stored disclosure and verification duties for a forum and a document type. United States: the recorded court and client answers Not tested by KitScout yet. When our harness runs it, pros, cons and the tasks we tried appear here, with the date and evidence.