better-codex

Behavioral guardrails for Codex coding work based on common user complaints. Use when Codex is asked to implement, modify, debug, review, test, or operate on a codebase and should avoid unsafe scope expansion, stale edits, fake completion, brittle edits, shallow debugging, superficial patch-on fixes, one-off special-case code, short-term design choices that hurt maintainability, blindly following incorrect user assumptions, poor dependency choices, generic product or UI output, over-mocked tests

Install

KitScout test notes

Not tested by KitScout yet. When our harness runs it, pros, cons and the tasks we tried appear here, with the date and evidence.

Similar tools

• rea-tool-design 456,474 ★
  Audit, investigate, design, or change REA investigation tools, CLI/MCP contracts, provider capabilities, and E
• reverse-engineer-anything 456,474 ★
  Reverse engineer native, managed, Electron/JavaScript, packaged, firmware, and browser targets with REA, and b
• code-review 323,337 ★
  Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does th
• codebase-design 323,337 ★
  Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interfac
• domain-modeling 323,337 ★
  Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLO