Categories › AI & Agents › Thinking, planning & prompt tools
Adversarial peer-review HARDENING pass for a ts-paper draft — the thing a forward-only drafter/refiner can't do: argue the other side of the paper's claims. Distilled from PaperJury into a lean Claude-native engine: N isolated domain reviewers read the whole paper (verbatim-quote anti-skim) → merge/dedupe → perspective-diverse skeptics try to refute each issue → loop-until-dry → a prioritized, verified issue list, which is fixed through the refine stage (each fix bound to a close_criterion) and
Not tested by KitScout yet. When our harness runs it, pros, cons and the tasks we tried appear here, with the date and evidence.